Issues

The issues we are concerned with include sign control (on-premise, billboards, electronic billboards), tree conservation, cell tower control, and place-sensitive highway design.

SIGN CONTROL

BILLBOARD LEGISLATION FINALLY ADDRESSES BILLBOARD PROLIFERATION IN MICHIGAN

Currently Michigan ranks second in the nation in the number of billboards. This proliferation of billboards attacks the visual beauty of our state. However, with Governor Granholms’ signing of Senate Bills 567 and 568 positive changes are on the way for 2007.

Scenic Michigan supported and helped shape Senate Bills 567 and 568 because we believed this legislation was a step in the right direction toward preserving Michigan’s scenic beauty. Senate Bill 567 was introduced by Senator Tom George of Kalamazoo, Michigan whose guidance and support helped to secure passage in the Michigan Legislature. This bill will reduce the number of outstanding permits granted for billboards yet to be built. Currently there are over 16,000 billboards in Michigan, and an additional 300 permits have been granted each year. Only 1 of 3 outstanding permits can be retained for future use. Scenic Michigan President, Bethany Goodman praised the Michigan Legislature for passing these bills as a commitment to the people of Michigan that “the view from the road” is worth protecting.

Scenic Michigan has been meeting with representatives from the Michigan Department of Transportation and the Outdoor Advertising Industry for the past year in an effort to work out specifics of the legislation, which includes managed tree trimming in front of billboards. We anticipate that the Michigan Department of Transportation will manage the trimming of trees in front of existing billboards in a reasonable manner. There are importation safeguards in place to regulate such trimming including considerations for safety, and the need to protect the environment and unique natural features that surround our roads and highways. In addition, there are significant penalties in place for improper trimming.

Scenic Michigan board member, Peter Steketee, of Grand Rapids, presented outstanding written and verbal testimony regarding the need to cap the number of Michigan billboards during the legislative learning on the bills. We thank him for serving as an effective spokesperson for Scenic Michigan.

BILLBOARD CONTROL BENEFITS EVERYONE

Public Act 0447 of 2006                                                                                               Public Act 0448 of 2006

BILLBOARD CONTROL IN YOUR COMMUNITY

RECOMMENDED ELEMENTS OF A SIGN ORDINANCE

Editorial Notation:

These Recommended Elements are being introduced at the Annual Scenic Michigan Conference on March 19, 2002.

Scenic Michigan provides these Recommended Elements of a Sign Ordinance for guidance and not as a substitute for planning or legal counsel. The state of law pertaining to signs continues to evolve. A legal challenge to a sign ordinance must always be expected. Accordingly, Scenic Michigan can make no representation that these Recommended Elements of a Sign Ordinance will be upheld by a court of law. Do not adopt these Recommended Elements without independent research of the then applicable law. Please consult your legal counsel before adopting an ordinance with these Recommended Elements.

A sign ordinance must be context sensitive. Municipalities should consult with planners to adapt these Recommended Elements to the setting.

Since the visual impact of on-premise Signs can be as detrimental as the impact of off-premise Signs (Billboards), these standards do not discriminate between on-premise and off-premise Signs. Both receive equal treatment in this document.

These Recommended Elements do not include all possible elements of a sign ordinance. The context sensitivity needed for a sign ordinance will vary with the type and location of a community. It is impossible to accommodate the particularities of each municipality in a uniform ordinance.

Accordingly, Scenic Michigan is pleased to offer these recommendations in the hope that they will be helpful in formulating an ordinance tailored to your particular needs. Please consult your planning staff and legal advisors.

INTRODUCTION - PREAMBLE

These Sign Standards are being ordained pursuant to (alternative #1: MCL 117.4i of the Home Rule City Act, alternative #2: MCL 252.304 of the Highway Advertising Act of 1972, which applies to cities, villages, townships, and charter townships) to preserve the public health, safety, and welfare of our municipality.

1. TITLE

This Ordinance shall be known as the ___________ Sign Standards.

2. STATEMENT OF PURPOSE

These Standards are adopted to:

1. Maintain and enhance the æsthetics of our community. 

2. Enhance pedestrian and traffic safety.

3. Limit the intrusion of visual messages.

4. Minimize the adverse effects of signs on nearby public and private property.

5. Minimize driver distraction.

6. Encourage native plants and landscaping material.

7. Avoid excessive signage.

8. Protect and enhance the scenic views and natural landscapes.

9. Protect and enhance economic viability by assuring aesthetic appeal for tourists, resorters, visitors, and residents.

10. Promote the use of aesthetically pleasing Sign materials and colors.

11. Avoid obstacles, distractions, or traffic hazards which impair a traveler=s ability to see pedestrians, traffic signs, or vehicles.

12. Preserve the right to enjoy scenic amenities.

13. Preserve public health, safety, and welfare.

14. Enhance the effectiveness of necessary directional and warning signs.

15. Enhance air movement and natural light.

16. Preserve property values.

17. Provide for the effectiveness of Permitted Signs.

18. Reduce the blighting influence of Signs.

19. Protect the night sky from stray lighting.

20. Avoid adverse lighting or reflection.

21. Require structurally safe Signs.

The Standards in this Ordinance are determined to be the minimum necessary to achieve the above stated purposes.

3. DEFINITIONS

a. Abandoned:A Sign shall be deemed Abandoned if:

1. It does not display a well-maintained message for a consecutive 120-day period;

2. The Owner of the Sign cannot be located at the Owner=s last known address, as reflected on the records of the Department; or

3. A structure designed to support a Sign no longer supports the Sign for a period of 120 consecutive days.

b. Department:  The Department of the City/Township/Village of

c. Directional Sign:  A Sign on private property without commercial message to give directions such as entrance, exit, or street numbers.

d. Governmental Sign:  A Sign authorized by this municipality, a governmental agency, the State of Michigan, or the federal government, for street direction, destination, hazardous condition, or traffic control purposes.

e. Ground Sign:  A Sign supported by one or more uprights, braces, pylons, or foundation elements located in or upon the ground and not attached to a building.

f. Owner:  A Person owning a Sign.

g. Parcel:  Contiguous real estate taxed as a single parcel on one side of a public road.

h. Permit:  The authorization for a Sign issued by the Department.

i. Person:  Any individual or entity, including a firm, partnership, association, corporation, limited liability company, trustee, and their legal successors.

j. Projecting Sign:  A Sign affixed to any part of a building or structure which extends beyond the building or structure by more than twelve inches.

k. Residential Neighborhood Identification Sign:  A Sign at the entrance of a residential neighborhood identifying the neighborhood.

l. Roof Sign:  A Sign erected, constructed, or maintained upon, or which projects above, the roof line of a building.

m. Sign:  An object, including a structure, movable object, wall, or image displaying any message visible to the public.

n. Special Event Sign:  A Sign for events such as grand openings, vehicle shows, displays, craft shows, benefits, fund-raisers, festivals, and other limited term events.

o. Wall Sign:  A Sign attached to, painted upon, placed against, or supported by the exterior surface of any building.

4. SIGNS AUTHORIZED WITHOUT A SIGN PERMIT

Subject to other applicable requirements and permits, the following Signs are authorized without a Sign Permit:

22. Small Sign. One Sign per Parcel, not illuminated, and not exceeding three square feet in area. The Sign may not exceed a height of forty-two inches (42") above ground level. Only one such sign is permitted for each Parcel. This Sign may carry any lawful message.

23. Governmental Signs. Governmental Signs are permitted.

24. Directional Signs. Directional Signs are permitted, however:

1. Only one entrance/exit Directional Sign per legal driveway.

2. A Directional Sign may not exceed 1.5 square feet.

25. Flags. Two governmental flags are permitted per Parcel. A flag pole may not exceed 30 feet above ground level. Non-governmental flags are Signs subject to this Ordinance.

26. Warning Signs. Signs exclusively devoted to warning the public of dangerous conditions and unusual hazards such as drop offs, high voltage, fire danger, and explosives, are permitted. Warning Signs may not exceed three square feet.

27. Historical Site Signs. A Sign erected by a government agency which exclusively denotes a government-recognized historical site is permitted. This Sign shall not exceed three square feet unless otherwise provided by state or federal law.

5. SIGNS AUTHORIZED WITH A PERMIT

The Department may issue a Permit for Signs in accordance with the following provisions.

28. Commercial/Retail Wall and Ground Signs. One Wall Sign and one Ground Sign are permitted for each commercial/retail Parcel. Such signs shall not exceed ten percent (10%) of the area of the front face of the building on the Parcel, or 100 square feet, whichever is less. A Ground Sign may not exceed a height of ten (10) feet above the uniform finished grade. Signs may be placed inside the window areas of buildings in commercial or retail zones. The Sign area may not exceed ten percent (10%) of the area of the window. The Window Sign area shall be deducted from Sign area permitted on the Parcel.

29. Office Wall or Ground Signs. One Wall Sign or one Ground Sign is permitted for each office Parcel. Such Signs shall not exceed ten percent (10%) of the area of the front face of the building on the Parcel, or fifty-six (56) square feet, whichever is less. A Ground Sign may not exceed a height of five (5) feet above the uniform finished grade.

30. Industrial/Manufacturing Wall or Ground Signs. One Wall Sign or one Ground Sign is permitted for each industrial/manufacturing Parcel. Such Signs shall not exceed ten percent (10%) of the area of the front face of the building on the Parcel, or fifty-six (56) square feet, whichever is less. A Ground Sign may not exceed a height of five (5) feet above the uniform finished grade.

31. Agricultural/Commercial Wall and Ground Signs. Two Wall or Ground Signs are permitted for each agricultural/commercial Parcel. The aggregate area of the two Signs shall not exceed twenty (20) square feet. A Ground Sign may not exceed a height of five (5) feet above the uniform finished grade.

32. Residential Neighborhood Identification Signs.

i. A Residential Neighborhood (Single-Family Subdivision, Multiple-Family, Attached Housing Development, etc.) is permitted to have one Residential Neighborhood Identification Sign for each entrance street. Such signs shall not extend into any public right-of-way. The face of the Sign shall not exceed twelve (12) square feet. The area of the structural supporting elements shall not exceed fifty percent (50%) of the area of the message portion of the Sign. The height of the Sign may not exceed five (5) feet above the uniform finished grade.

ii. Non-Dwelling Use Signs. A Non-Dwelling Use in a residential area, such as a school, a religious facility, an institutional use, a club house, etc., is permitted to have one Ground Sign and one Wall Sign, neither of which shall exceed twelve (12) square feet in area. The area of the structural elements supporting a Ground Sign shall not exceed fifty percent (50%) of the area of the message portion of the Sign. The height of a Ground Sign may not exceed five (5) feet above uniform finished grade.

6. SIGN PERMIT REQUIREMENTS

33. Enforcement. The Department shall administer and enforce this Sign Ordinance.

34. Permit. A Permit is not required for ASigns Authorized Without a Permit.@ A Permit must first be obtained from the Department for all other Signs.

35. Application. Applications for Sign Permits shall be made upon a form provided by the Department for this purpose. The Application shall contain the following information:

1. Name, address, phone, and if available, fax and e-mail, of the Person applying for the Permit.

2. Name, address, phone, and if available, fax and e-mail, of the Person owning the Parcel upon which the Sign is proposed to be placed.

3. Location of the building, structure, and Parcel on which the Sign is to be attached or erected.

4. Position of the Sign in relation to nearby buildings, structures, property lines, and existing or proposed rights-of-way.

5. Two copies of the plans and specifications. The method of construction and/or attachment to a building, or in the ground, shall be explained in the plans and specifications.

6. Copy of stress sheets and calculations, if deemed necessary by the Department, showing the structure as designed for dead load and wind pressure.

7. Name, address, phone, and if available, fax and e-mail of the Person erecting the Sign.

8. Insurance policy as required by this Ordinance.

9. Such other information as the Department may require to show compliance with this Sign Ordinance, and any other applicable laws.

10. The seal or certificate of a registered structural or civil engineer, when required by the Department.

11. The zoning district in which the Sign is to be placed.

12. A notice stating: Any change in the information in this Application, such as a change of address, shall be submitted to the Department within 7 days after the change.

36. Insurance Certificates. The Applicant for a Sign Permit shall provide a Certificate of Insurance to the Department. The insurance shall provide public liability in the amount of at least $100,000 for injuries to one person and $300,000 for injuries to more than one person, and property damage insurance in the amount of at least $100,000. The Sign Permit shall automatically be revoked if the insurance is permitted to lapse. The insurance policy shall require written notice to the Department at least 60 days before the insurance is cancelled or materially altered.

37. Permit Fees. Permit Fees for Signs shall be established by the governing body of this Municipality. The Permit Fees must relate to the cost of issuing the permit and may vary based on the size, type, and height of the Sign.

38. False Information. A Person providing false information under this Ordinance shall be guilty of a misdemeanor.

7. PROHIBITED SIGNS

The following limitations, obligations, and prohibitions apply to all Signs:

39. Absence of Permit. Any Sign for which a Permit has not been issued and which is not a Permitted Sign is prohibited.

40. Roof Signs and Projecting Signs. Roof Signs and Projecting Signs are prohibited.

41. Public Property. No portion of a privately-owned Sign, or its supporting structures, such as poles or cables, shall be placed on, or within the air space above, publicly owned property, a public right-of-way (such as a street or sidewalk), or a proposed public right-of-way.

42. Internally Lit Light Background Sign. Internally lit Signs with a transparent or light background color are prohibited. Dark background internally lit Signs are permitted when in compliance with other provisions of this Ordinance.

43. Changeable Message Signs. Changeable message Signs are prohibited.

44. Revolving Signs. A revolving Sign is prohibited.

45. Traffic Interference. A Sign (other than a traffic sign installed by a governmental entity) shall not simulate or imitate the size, lettering or design or any traffic sign in such manner as to interfere, mislead, or confuse the public.

46. Parked Vehicle. Any Sign on a motor vehicle or trailer which is parked in a position visible to traffic on a public road or parking area for a period longer than six days in a 60-day period is prohibited.

47. Portable Signs. Portable/moveable Signs such as wheeled devices and sandwich boards, are prohibited.

48. Special Event Signs. Separate Special Event Signs are not permitted. Special Events signage may, however, be displayed over or as a part of otherwise Permitted Signs.

CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS

49. Material. Where feasible, Signs should be made of materials such as cedar, fir, pine, weather-tolerant wood, or natural material.

50. Codes. All Signs shall conform to the latest edition of the applicable building and electrical codes.

51. Fastenings. All Signs must remain safe and secure during the period of use. All parts of the Signs, including bolts and cables, shall remain painted, and free of corrosion.

52. Fire Escapes. A Sign may not obstruct a fire escape.

53. Lighting. External lighting shall be shielded from view and shall be focused upon the Sign to avoid stray lighting. Flashing, rotating, and intermittent lighting are prohibited.

54. Identification. All Signs for which a Permit is required shall identify the name and operating telephone number of the Person responsible for the Sign.

55. Proximity to Electrical Conductors. Signs and all supporting structures shall be no closer to electrical utilities than is permitted by applicable codes. No Sign, including cables and supports, shall, in any event, be within six feet (6') of any electrical conductor, electrical light pole, electric street lamp, traffic light, or other public utility pole.

56. Sanitation. Property surrounding any Ground Sign shall be maintained in a clean and sanitary condition. It shall be free from weeds, rubbish, and flammable material.

57. Landscaping. The area beneath and around a Sign shall be landscaped with native plants and material so as to complement the site and integrate the Sign with buildings, parking areas, and natural site features.

58. Responsibility for Compliance. The Owner of the Parcel on which a Sign is placed and the Person maintaining the Sign are each fully responsible for the condition and the maintenance of the Sign, and the area around the Sign.

9. NON-CONFORMING SIGNS

59. Intent. This Ordinance is intended to encourage the eventual elimination of Signs which do not comply with the Ordinance. The elimination of non-conforming Signs is as much a subject of health, safety, and welfare as is the prohibition of new Signs in violation of this Ordinance. Therefore, this Ordinance attempts to realize the removal of non-conforming Signs and to avoid any unreasonable invasion of established property rights.

60. Amortization. A Sign not complying with this Ordinance, but in place on the effective date of this Ordinance, shall be removed, or brought into compliance with this Ordinance, within twelve (12) years after the Effective Date of this Ordinance.

61. Permit. Within ninety (90) days after the Effective Date of this Ordinance, the Person owning a Non-Conforming Sign shall apply for a Permit to the Department. The Department shall issue the Permit for not more than twelve (12) years.

62. Continuance. A non-conforming Sign may be continued during the Amortization period if it is maintained in good condition. It shall not, however, be replaced by another non-conforming Sign. It may not be structurally altered so as to prolong the life of the Sign. It may not be reestablished after damage or destruction if the Department determines that the estimated cost of reconstruction exceeds 50% of the estimated replacement cost.

63. Nuisance. An unsafe or Abandoned Sign is declared a public nuisance which shall be abated.

10. FIRST AMENDMENT PROTECTION

The placement of Directional Signs, Residential Neighborhood Signs, Historical Site Signs, and Flags is specifically authorized in this Ordinance. All other Signs allowed under this Ordinance may contain any lawful message.

11. ADMINISTRATION

64. Administrator. The Department shall appoint personnel to administer and enforce the terms and conditions of this Ordinance and all other provisions relating to Signs.

65. Enforcement. The Department shall issue Permits, as required by this Ordinance. The Department shall also ensure Signs comply with this Ordinance and any other applicable law. The Department shall also enforce the requirement that all Signs properly comply with this Ordinance by procuring a Permit. The Department shall make such inspections as may be necessary and shall initiate appropriate action to enforce compliance with this Ordinance and other applicable Sign laws.

66. Department Powers. The Department shall have the power and authority to administer and enforce this Ordinance. Included among such powers are the following specific powers:

4. The Department has the authority to revoke any Permi

1. Every Sign for which a Permit is required shall be subject to the inspection and approval of the Department. When deemed advisable, a Sign may be inspected at the point of manufacture.

2. Upon presentation of proper identification to the Sign Owner or Owner=s agent, the Department may enter the Sign area for purposes of inspecting the Sign, Sign structure, and any fasteners securing the Sign to a building or support. In cases of emergency, where imminent hazards to persons or property are known to exist, and where the Sign Owner, or Owner=s agent, is not readily available, the Department may enter the Sign area for purposes of inspection or remediation. When on private Property, the Department shall observe rules and regulations concerning safety, internal security, and fire protection. If the Department is denied admission to inspect any Sign, inspection shall be made only under authority of a warrant issued by a court of proper jurisdiction. When applying for such warrant, the Department shall submit an affidavit setting forth a belief that a violation of this Ordinance exists with respect to a particular Sign, and the reasons for forming this belief. The affidavit shall designate the place and name of the Person believed to own or possess the Sign. If the court finds probable cause exists for the search of the Sign, and supporting structures, then a warrant authorizing the search shall be issued. The warrant shall describe the property with sufficient certainty to identify the same. This warrant shall constitute authority for the Department to enter the Sign area and to inspect the property.

3. Upon issuance of a Stop Order from the Department, work on any Sign that is being conducted in any manner contrary to this Ordinance shall be immediately stopped. This notice and order shall be in writing and shall be given to the Owner of the Parcel, the Sign Owner, or to the person performing the work. The Stop Order shall state the conditions under which work may be resumed. The police department shall have authority to enforce a Stop Order.

4. The Department has the authority to revoke any Permit authorized by this Ordinance if the Sign violates this Ordinance or another law, provided that the Department shall offer the Sign Owner an opportunity to be heard. The Person whose Permit is under consideration shall be given at least ten (10) days= written notice of the time, place, and reason for the hearing. The Sign Owner and/or Person identified in the Permit shall be permitted to present relevant facts and legal argument concerning the pending revocation. Following this hearing, the Department shall consider the merits of the case and shall present a written opinion prior to any action. If, however, the Department believes the health, safety, or welfare of the citizens is endangered by any violation of this Ordinance, the Department may immediately revoke any Sign Permits.

5. A Sign installed after the effective date of this Ordinance, and not conforming to this Ordinance, shall be removed by the Owner. The Sign Owner shall not be entitled to compensation for the Sign removal and shall reimburse the Department for any costs incurred in connection with the removal.

6. Any Person violating any provision of this Ordinance shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and shall, upon conviction, be punished by a fine of not less than $___ and not more than $___ for each violation. Each day on which a violation occurs shall constitute a separate offense. In addition, the municipal attorney is authorized to take all action, legal, injunctive and equitable, to assure compliance with this Ordinance.

12. SEVERABILITY AND CONFLICT.

1. Severability. This Ordinance, and its parts, are declared to be severable. If any section, clause, provision, or portion of this Ordinance is declared invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, this decision shall not affect the validity of the Ordinance as a whole. All parts of the Ordinance not declared invalid or unconstitutional shall remain in full force and effect.

2. Conflict. If any part of this Ordinance is found to be in conflict with any other Ordinance or with any other part of this Ordinance, the most restrictive or highest standard shall prevail. If any part of this Ordinance is explicitly prohibited by federal or state statute, it shall not be enforced.

13. EFFECTIVE DATE.

EDITORIAL COMMENTS

2. Statement of Purpose. Other purposes can be added as deemed necessary.

To begin, there is no doubt that signs or billboards on a person's property Aby their very nature, wherever located, and however constructed, can be perceived as >esthetic harm.=@ Members of the City Council of Los Angeles v Taxpayers for Vincent, 466 U.S. 789, 808; 104 S. Ct. 2118; 80 L. ed. 2d 772 (1984), quoting Metromedia, Inc. v San Diego, 453 U.S. 490, 510; 101 S. Ct. 2882; 69 L. ed. 2d 800 (1981). In Metromedia, supra, seven U.S. Supreme Court justices explicitly found a municipality's interest in æsthetics would justify a ban on billboards. The majority agreed that a regulation could favor on-site commercial advertising over off-site advertising. The regulation could not, however, favor on-site commercial over noncommercial speech (such as political messages).

In Gannett Outdoor Company of Michigan v City of Troy, 156 Mich App 126, 135; 409 NW2d 719 (1986), the Michigan Court of Appeals stated: Athe city=s æsthetic interests are alone sufficient to justify billboard regulation . . .@

The Michigan Supreme Court has also acknowledged that æsthetics are a relevant municipal concern. Gackler Land Co v Yankee Springs Township, 427 Mich 562; 398 NW2d 393 (1986). Sign ordinances may not regulate the content of the message, but reasonable restrictions on time, place, and manner will be upheld. Therefore, controls on the size, location, and frequency of signs are routinely upheld by the courts. The regulations should be clear, definite, and objective. Subjective standards leaving unbridled discretion in the hands of local officials can be overturned for vagueness. First Amendment freedom of speech must also be respected, particularly for noncommercial Aspeech,@ i.e., political speech.

These Recommended Elements of a Sign Ordinance strive for content-neutrality. In some cases, it is impossible to avoid addressing content. For example, Directional Signs (e.g. Exit Signs) are needed for safety in buildings. The regulation of content in Directional Signs should fall within the permissible regulation of Atime, place, manner@ authorized by the courts under the First Amendment.

The Michigan Supreme Court has upheld the City of Holland ordinance disallowing new billboards. Adams Outdoor Advertising, Inc v Holland, 463 Mich. 675; 625 N.W.2d 377 (2001).

3. ADepartment@ definition. The name of the Department may vary depending upon the most suitable office to administer the Ordinance. In many cases, it will be the Building Department.

5a. Commercial/Retail Wall or Ground Sign. This category is intended to include commercial, retail, shopping centers, malls, central business districts, and business developments, by any name.

5b. Office Wall or Ground Sign. This category is intended to include general office, service, medical, dental, etc.

5c. Industrial/Manufacturing Wall or Ground Sign. This category is intended to include manufacturing, processing, warehousing, mini-storage, and industrial research developments.

5e. Residential. This category is intended to include the various uses permitted in residential zoning districts.

5h. Special Event Sign Permits. Special Event Sign Permits are not recommended. Special Events permits are of questionable legality and may compromise the integrity of the Sign Ordinance.

6d. Insurance Certificates. Insurance requirements will vary from one region to the next. Municipalities should evaluate the adequacy of insurance limits.

9b. Amortization. The Michigan Supreme Court has authorized the amortization ordinance adopted by the City of East Lansing in Adams v City of East Lansing, 463 Mich 17; 614 NW2d 634 (2000), reh den 463 Mich 1211 (2000). The following cases from around the nation also support amortization: Ackerley Communications v City of Seattle, 602 P2d 1177 (S. Ct. Wash, 1979); Art Neon Co v City and County of Denver, 488 F2d 488 (U.S. Ct. App., 10th Cir., 1974; City of Houston v Harris Co. Advertising Ass=n, 732 SW2d 42 (Tex. App, 1987); Naegele Outdoor Advertising Inc v City of Durham, 803 F Supp 1068 (1992), unpublished opinion per curiam, aff=d 1994. The Recommended Elements may cause existing Signs to become ANon-Conforming.@ (The term ANon-Conforming@ is in quotation marks since it is technically a zoning term. These Recommended Elements are proposed under the police powers of a municipality.) A municipality might consider amortizing the ANon-Conforming@ Signs.

13. Effective Date. Once discussion of a possible sign ordinance begins, the municipality should be prepared for a flood of signs hoping to be grand fathered after the ordinance is adopted. A temporary moratorium on signs might be considered. Here is a proposed draft of an ordinance for a temporary moratorium which should be considered before the municipality seriously addresses the adoption of a sign ordinance:

Whereas this city wishes to undertake a full review of its sign regulation ordinance, and as such wishes to obtain the comments from all aspects of the community, the industry and all other interested parties.

Whereas such a sign regulation ordinance will require substantial research.

And, whereas in the interim signs which may not be permitted under the new sign regulation ordinance may be erected, It is ordained that for purposes of this ordinance, a sign shall be defined as any object which conveys a message and is free standing or attached to a structure,

It is further ordained that no sign shall be erected in this city for a period of 180 days after the adoption of this ordinance,

And, finally, it is ordained that temporary signs may be erected pursuant to an agreement which includes the posting of costs for the removal of the sign in substance and form that is satisfactory to the City Manager and City Attorney.

SCENIC MICHIGAN SIGN & LIGHTING WORKSHOP

Scenic Michigan offers Sign and Lighting Workshops to Communities

Interested citizens, planners, zoning administrators and elected officials can all benefit from Scenic Michigan’s two hour Workshop which focuses on drafting sign ordinances that maintain community character, safety issues around signs and lighting and best practices for preserving the night sky.

Billboards, first amendment issues, writing, defending and enforcing sign and lighting ordinances will be presented by experts on the subject. Other topics include public safety and appearance issues, ways to save energy and money with lighting and signs and why communities should care about signs and lighting. Sample signs and lighting ordinances will be distributed as well as pictures of good lighting fixtures.

Scenic Michigan Sign & Light Workshop Flyer

ELECTRONIC BILLBOARD EXPLOSION

Undoubtedly you have noticed the disturbing increase in electronic or changeable message billboards. These signs change messages or faces every few seconds. Under recent billboard legislation enacted in Michigan, electronic messages can change no less than once every 6 seconds. However, the mere presence of these signs on our streets and highways raise issues even more pronounced than ordinary billboards. Most importantly, electronic billboards pose serious safety concerns.

A recent National Highway Traffic Safety Administration study revealed that taking one’s eyes off the road for more than two seconds “significantly increased individual near-crash/crash risk.” Changeable message billboards are worse from a driver distraction standpoint than ordinary billboards because drivers tend to keep looking at them after they have comprehended the initial message as they wait to see what the next message might be. As these signs have started to proliferate, communities around the country have begun trying to regulate them or ban them altogether.

Scenic Michigan will be following this issue as it develops and will recommend policies that minimize this disturbing trend.

Electronic Billboards Begin to Add Their Bright Blight to the American Landscape

____________________________________________________________________________

LOGO SIGNS AND TODS: PROVEN ALTERNATIVES TO BILLBOARDS

What are Logo Signs and TODS?

Logo signs and TODS (Tourist-Oriented Directional Signs) are alternatives to billboards used in many states to direct motorists to needed service and tourist attraction. Though federal law does not mandate signage programs in the states the Federal Highway Administration does set standards for logo signs and TODS on federal routes. More and more states and local businesses are discovering the economic and environmental benefits of logo signs and TODS.

Logo Signs are located on interstate highway rights-of-way and advertise gas, food, camping, and lodging at nearby exits, Highway-oriented businesses can advertise their company's symbol, name, trademark, or a combination on the appropriate sign. In some cases, additional directional signs are located on exit ramps and along feeder routes.

TODs, on the other hand, are located only on non-interstate highways. TODS provide motorists with the name of local tourist attractions, mileage to the establishment, and directional arrows. All tourist-related businesses are eligible for state-run TODS programs.

Why Are Logo Signs and TODS an Improvement Over Billboards?

Logo signs and TODS:

     • display only essential traveler information, whereas most billboards have little to do with motorist services,

     • are smaller, less obtrusive, and easier to read than billboards, and

     • enable roadside businesses to advertise for a fraction of the cost of using billboards.

How Much Do Logo Signs and TODS Cost?

A typical highway logo sign, maintained by a state transportation department, costs roadside businesses on average $800 per year, depending on the state's individual programs. On average, businesses are assessed an annual fee of approximately $75 to advertise on a TODS. Billboards, on the other hand, are a far more expensive advertising medium. According to the Congressional Research Services, billboards, rent for an average of $2,000 per month per sign.

Do Logo Signs Work?

Logo signs are very effective in directing travelers to roadside businesses. The reaction of the Kentucky Department of Tourism is typical: "There is strong political support here for logo signs and against large billboards."

Though a relatively new program, TODS have already proven a real benefit to local businesses. A 1991 study of TODS-commissioned programs in Oregon and Washington by the U.S. Department of Agriculture estimated direct benefits to local businesses in each state at $18.3 million and $7.4 million, respectively.

SCENIC AMERICA, WASHINGTON, DC http://scenic.org  202-638-0550

In Michigan there are specific criteria each type of business must meet to be eligible for the TODS or Logo sign program. Contact Michigan Logos, Inc., 5030 Northwind Drive, Suite #103, East Lansing, MI 48823, 1-888-645-6467 or 1-517-337-2267 for more information.

CONTEXT-SENSITIVE SOLUTIONS

On December 23, Governor Granholm signed Executive Directive 2003-25 instructing the department of transportation to implement and further develop context sensitive design (CSD) policies. CSD is a collaborative, interdisciplinary approach that involves all stakeholders to develop a transportation facility that fits its physical setting and preserves scenic, aesthetic, historic, and environmental resources, while maintaining safety and mobility. This is a fundamental shift in how major road projects are approached by MDOT planners and the Governor and Director Jeff should be commended! For a little more info on CSD, read below. The ED can be read at: http://www.michigan.gov/gov/0,1607,7-168-21975_22515-83562--,00.html.

______________________________________

Each year, a huge portion of the state's overall budget — more than $3 billion — is allocated to transportation, with at least 90 percent directed to the road and bridge program and the remainder being distributed to all other forms of transportation, from rail to buses to air and water — making transportation one of the most hotly debated items of this year’s budget process.

Not surprisingly, transportation projects also generate some of the most hotly contested decisions at the local level. Citizens lament costly projects that, due to rigid standards dictating wide, straight and uncompromising roads, often carve swaths of character from the middle of Michigan's most cherished communities, farms and forests. But at the same time, increasing congestion on our roads prompts outcry for new roads and bypasses. Caught in a nasty Catch-22, newer roads and bypasses are built and, within a short time, bring more sprawl and congestion in their wake.

Strict design standards and a paradigm that segregates transportation and land use planning into separate processes by independent agencies have stifled innovative transportation in Michigan, leading to dissatisfaction among residents and planners alike.

While MDOT currently attempts to incorporatethe public's input through a significant public hearing process, it is clear with each delayed project and controversial design that citizens, business interests and community leaders who may have a vested interest in the planning process too often have very little ownership of the project when the final plans are unveiled.

CSD offers an alternative to the traditional transportation-planning model. It integrates five core principles into the decision-making process:

     1. Transportation projects should promote safety in design, construction and maintenance;

     2. Mobility for all citizens via a variety of modes of travel is a legitimate issue in all Projects;

     3. Projects should take full advantage of opportunities to enhance the environment;

     4. Projects should protect the character of the communities they seek to mobilize; and

     5. Planners should use innovative public participation to generate publicly owned projects.

CSD involves a commitment to a process that encourages transportation officials to collaborate with community stakeholders so the design of the project reflects the goals of the people who live, work and travel in the area. Such collaboration results in creative and safe transportation solutions. Often referred to as "looking beyond the pavement," CSD articulates the role that streets and roads can play in enhancing communities and natural environments — be they urban, suburban or rural, scenic or historical. Through a planning and design process that encourages practitioners to collaborate with communities, CSD responds to local needs and values while accommodating the safe movement of motor vehicles.

CSD is not an entirely new process for MDOT and other Michigan planning officials who have developed community friendly projects under such programs as the national Scenic Byways program or the Michigan Heritage Route program. Until now, however, CSD has not been formally incorporated into the regular transportation-planning paradigm. One aspect of Michigan transportation planning that needs serious investigation is its relationship to land use planning at the local level. In its landmark 1995 study on state development trends, the Michigan Society of Planning Officials identified a sprawl cycle that continues today: new development precipitates transportation infrastructure expansion which in turn facilitates more new development. It doesn't matter which comes first, the road or the subdivision; once the cycle has begun, Michigan's transportation policies will perpetuate it. In recent months, the Michigan Land Use Leadership Council — a 26-person body appointed by Governor Granholm with the support of state legislative leaders — specifically recommended that the state support multimodal transportation systems and "alternative road design standards where safe and otherwise appropriate, including context-sensitive design rules that minimize environmental and community character impacts" [Chapter 4, Recommendation 6 and Chapter 6, Recommendation 9].

In many cases, roads facilitate economic development, including residential, commercial and industrial expansion. The sustainability of this growth, however, is at the heart of questions about our transportation system. CSD offers an opportunity for Michigan to end one of the cycles of sprawl that are undermining our communities. In the words of Tom Warne, Executive Director of the Utah Department of Transportation and Chairman of the AASHTO Standing Committee on Highways:

"This new approach is nothing less than visionary, and a transformation of the way state transportation agencies design their facilities and conduct their business, working with and for their customers... highway projects can be designed with imagination, creativity and collaboration to preserve and enhance the character and quality of a community without sacrificing transportation mobility and safety."

SCENIC MICHIGAN POLICY ON WIND DRIVEN ELECTRIC POWER PLANTS

Scenic Michigan (SM) enthusiastically supports the use of alternative energy sources to reduce our dependence on fossil fuels. This includes wind driven electric power plants, provided they are properly located, operated, and with provision for removal in the event of obsolescence.

SM believes some measure of local input and control of siting and operation is mandatory, perhaps through a model ordinance which could be used throughout Michigan. Given their potential impacts, SM does not believe installation of large, wind driven electric power plants should be permitted in Michigan as a matter of right by developers, electric utilities or units of government.

The factors which should be considered for each installation include:

• Impact of location of these tall structures (hundreds of feet high) in environmentally or visually sensitive areas

• Visual impact to residents and tourists

• Need for and appearance of facilities to connect to the electric grid such as a substation, security fencing, power lines and roads

• Blade and/or hub lighting to FAA requirements, especially flashing strobe lights

• Light flicker on neighbors due to sunlight reflected off blades

• Ice shedding potential

• Color of the units

• Proximity to migratory bird flyways and night flying birds and bats

• Noise

• Maintenance of the power plant site

• Economic viability, with and without tax credits

• Removal bond in the event of obsolescence

Communities and organizations evaluating wind driven electric power plants can obtain more information from Scenic Michigan, (231) 347-1117 or by e-mail, info@scenicmichigan.org. The following websites serve as an excellent resource: www.awea.org, www.nationalwind.org, www.responsiblewind.org, www.kingdomcommonsgroup.org, www.windcows.com.